by Wyvernwill » Mon Mar 14, 2011 1:48 pm
Really, I find myself at odds here. A large portion of me doesn't actually care about the nerf... it's still a "burn" disc to use when I have nothing else to use. I'll still be doing the best dps the class can, regardless what that number actually is, on fights where I can (things like event 1, event 4/5 of conv for example). The numbers themselves, relative to dps classes, don't matter to me, for the same reason my dps mattered zero to me previous to HoT. I didn't see the necessity for DPS other than a nice thing to have on fights where we weren't required to do other things... then again, I've always been a purist in Tanking > Healing > CC > DPS in my view points, which is typically at odds with others.
Even still, I find myself taken aback by this nerf... Overpowered... this disc was not, and is not. It's powerful, when stacked and combined with multiple effects. It allows Paladins to contribute a decent amount of dps when nothing else matters and they would otherwise be dead weight. I've seen what shiftie posted for rough estimates of the top end... I'm sorry, I just don't see how paladin "burns" are overpowered in light of what true dps classes do. As for my own personal experience...
At the farming Convorteum level, I don't beat our top wizards. I don't beat our top zerkers. I don't beat our top monks. I get destroyed entirely by our top rangers and rogues. Basically... the cream of the crop of my guild in the realm of dps... beats me, wether or not I use 7th and Glyphs. They don't even need glyphs or 7th to do so. On my best burns, the ones where things are premium, I 'might' catch 9th-10th on the parse. It's rare as heck when I even break 7th-8th.
The only contention of what is "out of balance"... is Shadowknight DPS. Fact of the matter is this:
Paladin burns were still less than Warrior burns - This is the expected as Warriors are intended to be higher than Paladins.
Paladin burns were still less than ALL DPS class top burns - This is to be expected, Paladins aren't a primary dps class.
Paladin burns were way superior to Shadowknight burns - This is errant. SKs should be higher outside of undead.
Shadowknight burns are inferior to Warrior burns - This is arguably errant. I have heard that Warriors are intended to be higher, and that SKs are to be higher... it seems to change depending on who says what. In either case, SK should be higher than Paladins and roughly in the Warrior ball park (give or take).
Nerfing Paladin burns (and really that's all that's being nerfed and tinkered with) does not help the class that is broken (Shadowknights). Shadowknights are truly the ONLY class out of line where they should be. This nerf, really, just doesn't make any sense other than to appease a class that basically has fallen apart over itself and it's overwhelming self arrogance.
Sorry Elidroth... I just cannot agree that nerfing Paladins is the correct route to fixing a problem that revolves around SKs not doing enough DPS. Let's face it, even after you nerf VR... Shadowknights are still PATHETIC at their designed secondary role of doing dps. All you're doing is hoping to calm 'outrage' by nerfing the least likely class to get bent out of shape over dps matters.